Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Jurij Rodionov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L W L
Form
W W L W W W L L W LHead To Head: Herbert 2 - 0 Rodionov
They have played 4 sets in total, with Herbert winning 4 and Rodionov winning 0. The last match between Herbert and Rodionov was at the Cherbourg Challenger, 15-03-2025, Semifinals, I.hard with Pierre-Hugues Herbert getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pierre-Hugues Herbert | 2 |
| Jurij Rodionov | 0 |
Cherbourg Challenger(15-03-2025)
6
4
6
2
| Herbert | Stats | Rodionov |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (18-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (14-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 147 | Ranking | 230 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 87 |
| 34 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 12 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (488-372) | Career Total W/L | 57% (293-225) |
| $2,858,716 | Career Prize Money | $527,715 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Jurij Rodionov
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Jurij Rodionov
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 9 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:3:10 | Average Match Time | 1:3:10 |
| 72% (66/92) | 1st Serve % | 59% (61/103) |
| 85% (56/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (35/61) |
| 58% (15/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (21/42) |
| 70% (7/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 46% (47/103) | Return Points Win % | 23% (21/92) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pierre-Hugues Herbert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
42%
(
39 of
92)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Federico Coria
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
7
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
7
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Harold Mayot
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Henrique Rocha
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
116)
14
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
2
81%
(
57 of
70)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
56 of
74)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
26 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
36 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
78%
(
98 of
126)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
10
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
48 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
119
Total Points Won
117
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Hynek Barton
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Jelle Sels
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jurij Rodionov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Jurij Rodionov
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Tom Paris
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
7
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Jurij Rodionov
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Jurij Rodionov
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Matteo Martineau
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Loann Massard
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jakub Paul
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Jurij Rodionov
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
90 of
136)
23
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
55 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
64 of
90)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
33 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
49 of
136)
130
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jan Choinski
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jakub Paul
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (488/372) | Win/Loss | 57% (293/225) |
| 55% (1142/943) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (687/556) |
| 52% (10749/10091) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6174/5830) |
| 53% (108/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (73/58) |
| 52% (118/110) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (96/81) |
| 62% (220/134) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (113/70) |
| 57% (42/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 41% (11/16) |
| 0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 5955 | Aces Total | 2583 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2908 | Total Double Faults | 1332 |
| 1:20:46 | Average Match Time | 1:33:32 |
| 496.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.45 |
| 57% (30778/53706) | 1st Serve % | 61% (21984/36002) |
| 76% (23313/30778) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (15522/21984) |
| 51% (11681/22928) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6945/14018) |
| 38% (1528/4067) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1291/3152) |
| 35% (18529/52567) | Return Points Win % | 37% (13325/35534) |
| 44% (36/46) | Slam W/L | 46% (16/19) |
| 52% (43/39) | Masters W/L | 30% (3/7) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 50% (5/5) |
| 55% (133/108) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (28/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (187/130) | Challenger W/L | 60% (193/130) |
| 65% (89/48) | Futures W/L | 65% (48/26) |
| 58% (463/805) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (288/509) |
| 38% (17/45) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 53% (227/431) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (106/194) |
| 54% (163/302) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (102/202) |
| 84% (451/379) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (290/239) |
| 16% (451/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (290/51) |
| 27% (409/109) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (228/54) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
